TY - JOUR
T1 - A psycho-social-environmental lens on radon air pollutant
T2 - authorities’, mitigation contractors’, and residents’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to domestic radon mitigation
AU - Hevey, David
AU - Perko, Tanja
AU - Martell, Meritxell
AU - Bradley, Gary
AU - Apers, Sofie
AU - Rovenská, Kateřina Navrátilová
N1 - Score=10
Funding Information:
The authors would like to express our sincere thanks to the responsible authorities for radon risk management in Belgium (FANC), Ireland (EPA), Slovenia (SNSA), and the UK (PHE) for their valuable participation in interviews and workshops. Our heartfelt gratitude also goes out to the participants of the focus groups in Ireland, Belgium and Slovenia, and the local authority in Kocevje, Slovenia, for their help in recruiting focus group participants. The authors wish to thank Kristin De Grouchy for conducting the focus groups in Ireland. Finally, the authors extend our thanks to the representatives of the radon mitigation industry who took the time to be interviewed and share their insights with us. Their contributions were invaluable to the success of this project.
Funding Information:
This project has received funding from the Euratom Research and Training Programme 2019–2020 RadoNorm under grant agreement No. 900009 and from the EU-RAP study under contract ENER/2020/NUCL/SI2.837814 (“Review and evaluation of national radon action plans established in EU Member States according to the requirements in Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom”).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Hevey, Perko, Martell, Bradley, Apers and Rovenská.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Radon is a major indoor air pollutant that poses a significant risk of lung cancer to those exposed in their homes. While mitigation of high radon levels in homes has been shown to be effective, home mitigation rates remain low. This study examines the barriers and facilitators to radon mitigation in homes from the perspectives of authorities responsible for radon risk management, the mitigation industry (contractors), and residents in four European countries (Belgium, Ireland, Slovenia, and the UK) with high radon risks and low mitigation rates. Methods: A multi-method approach was used to gather data from various stakeholders, including online surveys, content analysis of legal documents, group interviews, workshops, and focus groups. Results: Authorities, contractors, and residents identified various facilitators to radon mitigation, including legal requirements for mitigation, awareness campaigns, low mitigation costs, availability of financial support, accreditation of mitigation contractors, and a perception of radon as a health threat. However, barriers to mitigation were also identified, such as a lack of awareness, fragmented mitigation processes, and inadequate communication between stakeholders. Discussion: The study highlights the complexity of the radon mitigation process and suggests that interventions aimed at increasing mitigation rates should target stakeholders beyond just residents, such as constructors, health professionals, and policy makers. An integrated approach to radon mitigation, from policy to provision, is necessary to effectively lower levels of this indoor air pollutant.
AB - Introduction: Radon is a major indoor air pollutant that poses a significant risk of lung cancer to those exposed in their homes. While mitigation of high radon levels in homes has been shown to be effective, home mitigation rates remain low. This study examines the barriers and facilitators to radon mitigation in homes from the perspectives of authorities responsible for radon risk management, the mitigation industry (contractors), and residents in four European countries (Belgium, Ireland, Slovenia, and the UK) with high radon risks and low mitigation rates. Methods: A multi-method approach was used to gather data from various stakeholders, including online surveys, content analysis of legal documents, group interviews, workshops, and focus groups. Results: Authorities, contractors, and residents identified various facilitators to radon mitigation, including legal requirements for mitigation, awareness campaigns, low mitigation costs, availability of financial support, accreditation of mitigation contractors, and a perception of radon as a health threat. However, barriers to mitigation were also identified, such as a lack of awareness, fragmented mitigation processes, and inadequate communication between stakeholders. Discussion: The study highlights the complexity of the radon mitigation process and suggests that interventions aimed at increasing mitigation rates should target stakeholders beyond just residents, such as constructors, health professionals, and policy makers. An integrated approach to radon mitigation, from policy to provision, is necessary to effectively lower levels of this indoor air pollutant.
KW - Barriers
KW - Facilitators
KW - Lung cancer
KW - Mitigation
KW - Radon
KW - Risk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169321122&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1252804
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1252804
M3 - Article
C2 - 37649784
AN - SCOPUS:85169321122
SN - 2296-2565
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
JF - Frontiers in Public Health
M1 - 1252804
ER -