Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A wider perspective on the selection of countermeasures

  • G. Voigt
  • , K. Eged
  • , John Hilton
  • , B. J. Howard
  • , Z. Kis
  • , A. F. Nisbet
  • , D. H. Oughton
  • , Barbara Rafferty
  • , C. A. Salt
  • , J. T. Smith
  • , H. Vandenhove

    Research output › peer-review

    Abstract

    In the past, the decision to apply countermeasures following nuclear accidents has been based primarily on their effectiveness in averting dose to man. However, particularly in recent years since the Chernobyl accident in 1986, it has been realised that other factors also need to be considered. These include the reasons and justification for introducing the countermeasure, the time scale over which they will be used, their effectiveness and their practicability. Practicability includes factors such as technical limitations and capacity, exposure during implementation, potential environmental impacts, economic implications and acceptability (both social and ethical) as well as a number of site specific issues. These criteria have been used to evaluate a range of commonly used countermeasures and a spreadsheet information system has been prepared by the members of an IUR Action Group. The system highlights factors to be taken into consideration in making a decision on the implementation of countermeasures.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)45-48
    Number of pages4
    JournalRadiation protection dosimetry
    Volume92
    Issue number1-3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2000

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. Good health and well being
      Good health and well being

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
    • Radiation
    • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Cite this