Calibration of Richards' and convection-dispersion equations to field-scale water flow and solute transport under rainfall conditions

Diederik Jacques, Jirka Šimůnek, Anthony Timmerman, Jan Feyen

    Research outputpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this paper, the applicability of Richards' equation for water flow and the convection - dispersion equation for solute transport is evaluated to model field-scale flow and transport under natural boundary conditions by using detailed experimental data and inverse optimization. The data consisted of depth-averaged time series of water content, pressure head and resident solute concentration data measured several times a day during 384 d. In a first approach, effective parameters are estimated using the time series for one depth and assuming a homogeneous soil profile. In a second approach, all time series were used simultaneously to estimate the parameters of a multi-layered soil profile. Water flow was described by the Richards' equation and solute transport either by the equilibrium convection - dispersion (CDE) or the physical non-equilibrium convection - dispersion (MIM) equation. To represent the dynamics of the water content and pressure head data, the multi-layered soil profile approach gave better results. Fitted soil hydraulic parameters were comparable with parameters obtained with other methods on the same soil. At larger depths, both the CDE- and MIM-models gave acceptable descriptions of the observed breakthrough data, although the MIM performed somewhat better in the tailing part. Both models underestimated significantly the fast breakthrough. To describe the breakthrough curves at the first depth, only the MIM with a mixing layer close to the soil surface gave acceptable results. Starting from an initial value problem with solutes homogeneously distributed over the mobile and immobile water phase was preferable compared to the incorporation of a small layer with only mobile water near the soil surface.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)15-31
    Number of pages17
    JournalJournal of Hydrology
    Volume259
    Issue number1-4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Mar 2002

    Funding

    This study was done with financial support of a Research Grant of the Fund for Scientific Research- Flanders (Belgium) (F.W.O.- Vlaanderen). The first author acknowledges the financial support of a scholarship of the Flemish Institute for the Encouragement of Scientific–Technological Research in the Industry (IWT). The inverse optimization was performed at the US Salinity Laboratory, USDA-ARS, made possible through a travel grant of the Fund for Scientific Research—Flanders (Belgium) (F.W.O.-Vlaanderen) and a grant of the National Science Foundation—USA. We acknowledge the family Deckers, owners of the experimental field, for the permission to perform these experiments on their property. The assistance of J. Schaerlaekens, F. Serneels, and J. Vanderborght in the field and the laboratory is highly appreciated. The comments of the anonymous reviewer to improve the overall quality of the paper are also highly appreciated.

    FundersFunder number
    VITO - Flemish Institute for Technological Research
    USDA - United States Department of Agriculture
    NSFC - National Natural Science Foundation of China
    FRS-FNRS - Fond national de la recherche scientifique
    Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

      ASJC Scopus subject areas

      • Water Science and Technology

      Cite this