TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of empirical interatomic potentials for iron applied to radiation damage studies
AU - Malerba, Lorenzo
AU - et al.
A2 - Terentyev, Dmitry
N1 - Score = 10
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - The performance of four recent semi-empirical interatomic potentials for iron, developed or used within
the FP6 Perfect Project, is evaluated by comparing them between themselves and with available experimental
or, more often, density functional theory data. The quantities chosen for the comparison are of
specific interest for radiation damage studies, i.e. they concern mainly properties of point-defects and
their clusters, as well as dislocations. For completeness, an earlier, widely used (also within the Project)
iron potential is included in the comparison exercise as well. This exercise allows conclusions to be drawn
about the reliability of the available potentials, while providing a snapshot of the state-of-the-art concerning
fundamental properties of iron, thereby being also useful as a kind of handbook and as a framework
for the validation of future semi-empirical interatomic potentials for iron. It is found that
Mendelev-type potentials are currently the best choice in order to ‘‘extend density functional theory”
to larger scales and this justifies their widespread use, also for the development of iron alloy potentials.
However, a fully reliable description of self-interstitial atom clusters and dislocations with interatomic
potentials remains largely an elusive objective, that calls for further effort within the concerned scientific
community.
AB - The performance of four recent semi-empirical interatomic potentials for iron, developed or used within
the FP6 Perfect Project, is evaluated by comparing them between themselves and with available experimental
or, more often, density functional theory data. The quantities chosen for the comparison are of
specific interest for radiation damage studies, i.e. they concern mainly properties of point-defects and
their clusters, as well as dislocations. For completeness, an earlier, widely used (also within the Project)
iron potential is included in the comparison exercise as well. This exercise allows conclusions to be drawn
about the reliability of the available potentials, while providing a snapshot of the state-of-the-art concerning
fundamental properties of iron, thereby being also useful as a kind of handbook and as a framework
for the validation of future semi-empirical interatomic potentials for iron. It is found that
Mendelev-type potentials are currently the best choice in order to ‘‘extend density functional theory”
to larger scales and this justifies their widespread use, also for the development of iron alloy potentials.
However, a fully reliable description of self-interstitial atom clusters and dislocations with interatomic
potentials remains largely an elusive objective, that calls for further effort within the concerned scientific
community.
KW - interatomic potentials
KW - iron
KW - radiation damage
UR - http://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll/open/ezp_108418
UR - http://knowledgecentre.sckcen.be/so2/bibref/7242
U2 - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.017
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-3115
VL - 406
SP - 19
EP - 38
JO - Journal of Nuclear Materials
JF - Journal of Nuclear Materials
IS - 1
ER -