TY - JOUR
T1 - Decalcification of cracked cement structures
AU - Perko, Janez
AU - Mayer, K. Ulrich
AU - Kosakowski, Georg
AU - De Windt, Laurent
AU - Govaerts, Joan
AU - Jacques, Diederik
AU - Su, Sanyang
AU - Meeussen, Johannes C. L.
N1 - Score = 10
PY - 2015/6
Y1 - 2015/6
N2 - The dissolution of cement minerals in this case progresses heterogeneously as a consequence of a small-scale geometrical feature (crack) within a domain. Complexity of transport through cracked porous media combined with complex cement chemistry can lead to considerable modelling uncertainties. One possible way to get an insight into the robustness of modelling results is to perform benchmark based on (i) different transport models and solution methods (finite volume, finite element, etc.), (ii) different geochemical solvers and (iii) different coupling algorithms (sequential iterative and non-iterative). This benchmark is designed to gradually increase the complexity of the problem and in this way recognize modelling elements that are the most sensitive in terms of modelling results, e.g. evolution of physical and chemical properties. Five international teams participated in this benchmark exercise. The reactive transport codes used (HYTEC, MIN3P, OGS-GEM, ORCHESTRA, COMSOL Multiphysics-iPHREEQC) give similar patterns in terms of predicted concentrations of elements and the mineralogy. The level of agreement depends on the problem complexity related mainly to the weighting and conservation properties of different numerical methods, to the coupling between transport and reactive solver and the agreement of thermodynamic database.
AB - The dissolution of cement minerals in this case progresses heterogeneously as a consequence of a small-scale geometrical feature (crack) within a domain. Complexity of transport through cracked porous media combined with complex cement chemistry can lead to considerable modelling uncertainties. One possible way to get an insight into the robustness of modelling results is to perform benchmark based on (i) different transport models and solution methods (finite volume, finite element, etc.), (ii) different geochemical solvers and (iii) different coupling algorithms (sequential iterative and non-iterative). This benchmark is designed to gradually increase the complexity of the problem and in this way recognize modelling elements that are the most sensitive in terms of modelling results, e.g. evolution of physical and chemical properties. Five international teams participated in this benchmark exercise. The reactive transport codes used (HYTEC, MIN3P, OGS-GEM, ORCHESTRA, COMSOL Multiphysics-iPHREEQC) give similar patterns in terms of predicted concentrations of elements and the mineralogy. The level of agreement depends on the problem complexity related mainly to the weighting and conservation properties of different numerical methods, to the coupling between transport and reactive solver and the agreement of thermodynamic database.
KW - Decalcification
KW - Hardened cement paste
KW - Transport in cracked porous media
KW - Benchmark
KW - reactive transport modelling
UR - http://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll/open/ezp_140618
UR - http://knowledgecentre.sckcen.be/so2/bibref/13017
U2 - 10.1007/s10596-014-9467-2
DO - 10.1007/s10596-014-9467-2
M3 - Article
SN - 1420-0597
VL - 19
SP - 673
EP - 693
JO - Computational Geosciences
JF - Computational Geosciences
IS - 3
ER -