TY - GEN
T1 - Decay heat benchmark for uranium-free fuels with Minor Actinides
AU - Rineiski, Andrei
AU - Rimpault, Gérald
AU - Glinatsis, Georgios
AU - Messaoudi, Nadia
AU - Pelloni, Sandro
AU - Schwenk-Ferrero, Aleksandra
AU - Vicente, Maria Carmen
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The decay heat (energy due to decay of unstable nuclei) is a small fraction of reactor power at nominal conditions, but after reactor shut-down it is the most important heat source. For taking this source into account in design and safety studies, recommendations are available for fuels of operating reactors, such as UOX and MOX. Fuels for EFIT (European Facility for Industrial Transmutation), unlike UOX and MOX, should contain a significant amount of Minor Actinides (MAs) that would influence decay heat. CEA, CIEMAT, ENEA, FZK (now KIT), PSI and SCK•CEN established a benchmark case and computed decay heat curves for MA-bearing fuels and a MOX-type fuel. The decay heat in the fuels with MAs is appreciably higher than in MOX, except for low burnup cases after short cooling times. This should be taken into account in the design of the decay heat removal system for EFIT. The obtained differences between the decay heat in MA-bearing and MOX fuels are supposed to be representative for the benchmark (or similar) conditions. More effort is needed to evaluate the uncertainties of the computed results.
AB - The decay heat (energy due to decay of unstable nuclei) is a small fraction of reactor power at nominal conditions, but after reactor shut-down it is the most important heat source. For taking this source into account in design and safety studies, recommendations are available for fuels of operating reactors, such as UOX and MOX. Fuels for EFIT (European Facility for Industrial Transmutation), unlike UOX and MOX, should contain a significant amount of Minor Actinides (MAs) that would influence decay heat. CEA, CIEMAT, ENEA, FZK (now KIT), PSI and SCK•CEN established a benchmark case and computed decay heat curves for MA-bearing fuels and a MOX-type fuel. The decay heat in the fuels with MAs is appreciably higher than in MOX, except for low burnup cases after short cooling times. This should be taken into account in the design of the decay heat removal system for EFIT. The obtained differences between the decay heat in MA-bearing and MOX fuels are supposed to be representative for the benchmark (or similar) conditions. More effort is needed to evaluate the uncertainties of the computed results.
KW - Bearings (structural)
KW - Fuels
KW - Neutron detectors
KW - Nuclear engineering
KW - Nuclear industry
KW - Structural design
KW - Uranium
KW - Burn up
KW - MOX fuel
KW - Decay heat removal systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053253695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/ICONE18-29654
DO - 10.1115/ICONE18-29654
M3 - In-proceedings paper
AN - SCOPUS:80053253695
SN - 9780791849309
VL - 2
T3 - International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Proceedings, ICONE
BT - 18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE18
T2 - 18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE18
Y2 - 17 May 2010 through 21 May 2010
ER -