TY - JOUR
T1 - Experimental evaluation of epithermal neutron self-shielding for 96Zr and 98Mo
AU - Farina Arboccò, F.
AU - Vermaercke, Peter
AU - Verheyen, Leen
AU - Strijckmans, K.
A2 - Sneyers, Liesel
N1 - Score = 10
PY - 2012/12/18
Y1 - 2012/12/18
N2 - In a previous work we experimentally tested
some neutron self-shielding calculations methods for thermal
absorbers, from which the semi-empirical ‘‘sigmoid
method’’ gave the most accurate results. In this work we aim
at evaluating the accuracy of this method on the epithermal
self-shielding phenomena as compared to the analytical
‘‘MatSSF method’’. Metallic foils of Zr and Mo were
compactly stacked together into small cylinders (or disks) of
different thickness, allowing for up to 20 % epithermal selfshielding
when irradiated on two channels of the BR1
reactor. A 2 % relative difference between calculated and
experimental self-shielding factors was obtained from the
MatSSF method when a perpendicular source-sample axial
configuration was assumed, while the isotropic or the coaxial
configuration alternatives gave up to 10 % relative
differences. On the other hand, the sigmoid method gave
relative differences of up to 6 % that can be reduced to just
2 % by applying the ‘‘effective’’ epithermal absorption
cross-sections for 98Mo and 96Zr proposed in this work.
AB - In a previous work we experimentally tested
some neutron self-shielding calculations methods for thermal
absorbers, from which the semi-empirical ‘‘sigmoid
method’’ gave the most accurate results. In this work we aim
at evaluating the accuracy of this method on the epithermal
self-shielding phenomena as compared to the analytical
‘‘MatSSF method’’. Metallic foils of Zr and Mo were
compactly stacked together into small cylinders (or disks) of
different thickness, allowing for up to 20 % epithermal selfshielding
when irradiated on two channels of the BR1
reactor. A 2 % relative difference between calculated and
experimental self-shielding factors was obtained from the
MatSSF method when a perpendicular source-sample axial
configuration was assumed, while the isotropic or the coaxial
configuration alternatives gave up to 10 % relative
differences. On the other hand, the sigmoid method gave
relative differences of up to 6 % that can be reduced to just
2 % by applying the ‘‘effective’’ epithermal absorption
cross-sections for 98Mo and 96Zr proposed in this work.
KW - Neutron self-shielding
KW - Resonances
KW - Neutron absorption
KW - Bell factor
KW - Effective epithermal absorption cross-sections
KW - Sigmoid method
KW - MatSSF method
UR - http://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll/open/ezp_132864
UR - http://knowledgecentre.sckcen.be/so2/bibref/11007
U2 - 10.1007/s10967-012-2363-0
DO - 10.1007/s10967-012-2363-0
M3 - Article
SN - 0236-5731
VL - 297
SP - 371
EP - 375
JO - Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
JF - Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
IS - 3
ER -