TY - BOOK
T1 - Harnessing international co-operation for the management of transuranics
T2 - a comparative study
AU - Merino Rodríguez, Iván
AU - Hernandez Solis, Augusto
AU - Romojaro, Pablo
AU - Wojtaszek, Daniel
AU - Carlier, Bertrand
AU - Courtin, Fanny
AU - Ernoult, Marc
AU - Krivtchik, Guillaume
AU - Halasz, Mate
AU - Sziebert, M.
AU - Brolly, Aron
AU - Rocchi, Federico
AU - Ono, Kiyoshi
AU - Ohtaki, Akira
AU - Kato, Takao
AU - Alvarez Velarde, Francisco
AU - Villacorta Skarbeli, Aris
AU - Dixon, Brent
AU - Feng, Bo
AU - Hays, Ross
AU - Dabiran-Zohoory, Shahab
AU - Grassi, Gabriele
AU - Cornet, Stephanie
N1 - Score=1
RN NEA No. 7751
PY - 2026/6/10
Y1 - 2026/6/10
N2 - The report examines strategies for handling transuranic elements (TRU) such as plutonium and minor actinides, which pose long-term challenges for radioactive waste management and nuclear safeguards. Under the auspices of the Nuclear Energy Agency’s Expert Group on Advanced Fuel Cycle Scenarios, this report explores how different reactor technologies and international collaboration could stabilise TRU inventories over 300-year scenarios. The study evaluates transitions from traditional pressurised water reactors (PWR) to advanced systems, such as mixed oxide (MOX)-fuelled PWRs, sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFR), and accelerator driven systems. Two phases were completed: Phase 1 assessed a wide range of TRU-burning scenarios; Phase 2 focused on eight promising pathways, benchmarking their performance using multiple simulation codes. Key findings include many advanced reactor fleets can stabilise plutonium inventories; effective minor actinide recycling is essential to prevent long-term TRU growth; and international fuel sharing, such as one nation supplying spent fuel to another deploying advanced reactors, supports smoother transitions without hindering TRU stabilisation. The report highlights multiple pathways to stabilise TRU, providing insights for R&D, policy and international collaboration on sustainable nuclear fuel cycle management.
AB - The report examines strategies for handling transuranic elements (TRU) such as plutonium and minor actinides, which pose long-term challenges for radioactive waste management and nuclear safeguards. Under the auspices of the Nuclear Energy Agency’s Expert Group on Advanced Fuel Cycle Scenarios, this report explores how different reactor technologies and international collaboration could stabilise TRU inventories over 300-year scenarios. The study evaluates transitions from traditional pressurised water reactors (PWR) to advanced systems, such as mixed oxide (MOX)-fuelled PWRs, sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFR), and accelerator driven systems. Two phases were completed: Phase 1 assessed a wide range of TRU-burning scenarios; Phase 2 focused on eight promising pathways, benchmarking their performance using multiple simulation codes. Key findings include many advanced reactor fleets can stabilise plutonium inventories; effective minor actinide recycling is essential to prevent long-term TRU growth; and international fuel sharing, such as one nation supplying spent fuel to another deploying advanced reactors, supports smoother transitions without hindering TRU stabilisation. The report highlights multiple pathways to stabilise TRU, providing insights for R&D, policy and international collaboration on sustainable nuclear fuel cycle management.
KW - Fuel cycle
KW - ANICCA
KW - OECD/NEA
KW - EGAFCS
UR - https://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll/open/100875055
M3 - ER - External report
T3 - OECD Reports
BT - Harnessing international co-operation for the management of transuranics
PB - OECD NEA - Nuclear Energy Agency
ER -