TY - JOUR
T1 - Image quality assessment using the CD-DISC phantom for vascular radiology and vascular surgery
AU - Struelens, Lara
AU - Hambach, Lionel
AU - Buls, Nico
AU - Smans, Kristien
AU - Malchair, Françoise
AU - Hoornaert, Marie-Thérèse
AU - Vanhavere, Filip
AU - Bosmans, Hilde
A2 - D'Agostino, Emiliano
N1 - Score = 10
PY - 2008/7
Y1 - 2008/7
N2 - The purpose of the study was to evaluate image quality (IQ) associated with vascular radiology and vascular surgery procedures in Belgium
and to determine reference values for future image quality assessment. IQ was evaluated with the CD-DISC contrast-detail phantom. Images of the phantom were acquired for both fluoroscopy and subtraction images on 21 systems. Three observers evaluated the images by determining the threshold contrast visible
for every diameter. We observed a large difference in IQ between the centres. No
straightforward correlation could be found with radiation dose or other exposure settings. A comparison was made with the image quality evaluation of the systems performed with the TOR[18FG] phantom for fluoroscopy. There is no
clear correlation observed between the results of the CD-DISC phantom and the TOR phantom. However, systems with very poor or very good
image quality could be detected by both phantoms.
An important result is that a 75th percentile reference contrast-detail curve could be proposed to separate the best centres from these with poorer
quality. We introduced also a 25th percentile. Centres with IQ
above this value are recommended to lower the dose and work with acceptable rather than excellent image quality.
AB - The purpose of the study was to evaluate image quality (IQ) associated with vascular radiology and vascular surgery procedures in Belgium
and to determine reference values for future image quality assessment. IQ was evaluated with the CD-DISC contrast-detail phantom. Images of the phantom were acquired for both fluoroscopy and subtraction images on 21 systems. Three observers evaluated the images by determining the threshold contrast visible
for every diameter. We observed a large difference in IQ between the centres. No
straightforward correlation could be found with radiation dose or other exposure settings. A comparison was made with the image quality evaluation of the systems performed with the TOR[18FG] phantom for fluoroscopy. There is no
clear correlation observed between the results of the CD-DISC phantom and the TOR phantom. However, systems with very poor or very good
image quality could be detected by both phantoms.
An important result is that a 75th percentile reference contrast-detail curve could be proposed to separate the best centres from these with poorer
quality. We introduced also a 25th percentile. Centres with IQ
above this value are recommended to lower the dose and work with acceptable rather than excellent image quality.
KW - Image quality
KW - vascular radiology
KW - vascular surgery
UR - http://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll/open/ezp_90460
UR - http://knowledgecentre.sckcen.be/so2/bibref/5071
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.07.019
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.07.019
M3 - Article
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 67
SP - 348
EP - 356
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
IS - 2
ER -