TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiation adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) are on the horizon: Advancing radiation protection through an international Horizon-Style exercise
AU - Burtt, Julie J.
AU - Leblanc, Julie
AU - Randhawa, Kristi
AU - Rudd, Murray A.
AU - Wilkins, Ruth
AU - Azzam, Edouard I.
AU - Hecker, Markus
AU - Horemans, Nele
AU - Vandenhove, Hildegarde
AU - Adam-Guillermin, Christelle
AU - Armant, Olivier
AU - Klokov, Dmitry
AU - Audouze, Karine
AU - Kaiser, Jan Christian
AU - Moertl, Simone
AU - Lumniczky, Katalin
AU - Braga Tanaka III, Ignacia
AU - Yamada, Yutaka
AU - Hamada, Nobuvuki
AU - Al-Nabulsi, Isaf
AU - Preston, Julian R.
AU - Bouffler, Simon
AU - Applegate, Kimberly
AU - Cool, Donald
AU - Beaton, Danielle
AU - Tollefsen, Knut Erik
AU - Garnier-Laplace, Jacqueline
AU - Laurier, Dominique
AU - Chauhan, Vinita
N1 - Score=10
PY - 2022/9/26
Y1 - 2022/9/26
N2 - Purpose: The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework, a systematic tool that can link available mechanistic data with phenotypic outcomes of relevance to regulatory decision-making, is being explored in areas related to radiation risk assessment. To examine the challenges including the use of AOPs to support the radiation protection community, an international horizon-style exercise (HSE) was initiated through the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency High-Level Group on Low Dose Research Radiation/Chemical AOP Joint Topical Group (JTG). The objective of the HSE was to facilitate the collection of ideas from a range of experts, to short-list a set of priority research questions that could, if answered, improve the description of the radiation dose-response relationship for low dose/dose-rate exposures, as well as reduce uncertainties in estimating the risk of developing adverse health outcomes following such exposures.
Materials and methods: The HSE was guided by an international steering committee (SC) of radiation risk experts. In the first phase, research questions were solicited on areas that can be supported by the AOP framework, or challenges on the use of AOPs in radiation risk assessment. In the second phase, questions received were refined and sorted by the SC using a best-worst scaling (BWS) method. During a virtual 3-day workshop, the list of questions was further narrowed. In the third phase, an international survey of the broader radiation protection community led to an orderly ranking of the top questions.
Results: Of the 271 questions solicited, 254 were accepted and categorized into 9 themes. These were further refined to the top 25 prioritized questions. Among these, the higher ranked questions will be considered as ‘important’ to drive future initiatives in the low dose radiation protection community. These included questions on the ability of AOPs to delineate responses across different levels of biological organization, and how AOPs could be applied to address research questions on radiation quality, doses or dose-rates, exposure time patterns and deliveries, and uncertainties in low dose/dose-rate effects. A better understanding of these concepts is required to support the use of the AOP framework in radiation risk assessment.
AB - Purpose: The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework, a systematic tool that can link available mechanistic data with phenotypic outcomes of relevance to regulatory decision-making, is being explored in areas related to radiation risk assessment. To examine the challenges including the use of AOPs to support the radiation protection community, an international horizon-style exercise (HSE) was initiated through the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency High-Level Group on Low Dose Research Radiation/Chemical AOP Joint Topical Group (JTG). The objective of the HSE was to facilitate the collection of ideas from a range of experts, to short-list a set of priority research questions that could, if answered, improve the description of the radiation dose-response relationship for low dose/dose-rate exposures, as well as reduce uncertainties in estimating the risk of developing adverse health outcomes following such exposures.
Materials and methods: The HSE was guided by an international steering committee (SC) of radiation risk experts. In the first phase, research questions were solicited on areas that can be supported by the AOP framework, or challenges on the use of AOPs in radiation risk assessment. In the second phase, questions received were refined and sorted by the SC using a best-worst scaling (BWS) method. During a virtual 3-day workshop, the list of questions was further narrowed. In the third phase, an international survey of the broader radiation protection community led to an orderly ranking of the top questions.
Results: Of the 271 questions solicited, 254 were accepted and categorized into 9 themes. These were further refined to the top 25 prioritized questions. Among these, the higher ranked questions will be considered as ‘important’ to drive future initiatives in the low dose radiation protection community. These included questions on the ability of AOPs to delineate responses across different levels of biological organization, and how AOPs could be applied to address research questions on radiation quality, doses or dose-rates, exposure time patterns and deliveries, and uncertainties in low dose/dose-rate effects. A better understanding of these concepts is required to support the use of the AOP framework in radiation risk assessment.
KW - Adverse outcome pathway
KW - Regulatory application
KW - Survey
KW - Low dose radiation
KW - Radiation protection
KW - Risk assessment
UR - https://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll/open/53181511
U2 - 10.1080/09553002.2022.2121439
DO - 10.1080/09553002.2022.2121439
M3 - Article
SN - 0955-3002
VL - 98
JO - International Journal of Radiation Biology
JF - International Journal of Radiation Biology
IS - 12
M1 - 2121436
ER -